Informative Insight
The difference between ECP and EECP
What is the difference between ECP and EECP?
ECP and EECP are fundamentally identical non-invasive treatments. Initially, both terms emerged due to the earliest ECP devices inflating all cuffs simultaneously. However, in the past two decades, technological advancements have led to all devices adopting sequential cuff inflation: calves first, followed by thighs, then buttocks/hips. This refined method is commonly referred to as “enhanced ECP” or EECP.
Adding complexity, Vasomedical, a manufacturer of ECP devices, trademarked the term EECP in 1995. Despite this branding distinction, there is no functional disparity between EECP and ECP therapy. Both treatments involve applying cuffs to the calves, thighs, and hips, which inflate in sequence to enhance blood flow to the heart.
Are the Clinical Benefits of EECP therapy better than ECP therapy?
The clinical benefits of EECP (Enhanced External Counterpulsation) therapy are not inherently better than those of ECP (External Counterpulsation) therapy. Both treatments deliver equally effective results when the same treatment variables are applied. Despite occasional misconceptions that EECP and ECP are different procedures, they utilise the same process. Therefore, EECP and ECP treatments are virtually the same in terms of the actual treatment process and outcomes. Both can deliver optimal results when applied correctly and are subject to the same regulatory standards to ensure patient safety and efficacy.
It’s important to note that clinical validation of EECP and ECP therapy devices is based on established regulatory standards set by organisations such as the The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Singapore’s Health Sciences Authority (HSA) or Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). While certain companies may sponsor clinical trials to demonstrate the effectiveness of their products, all EECP and ECP devices must meet the same regulatory requirements for safety and performance.